ERC Today we learned that yesterday decided to vote NO its territorial assemblies (10 of 11), again, in their territorial assemblies, not the party executive, who had already decided last week to use the voting political void, ie a different choice of the party base. I sincerely believe that any of the two options are misguided, and have a cause that is beyond the statute whether or not a content or other, I think it has more to do with poor management by the ERC as the already "But Zapatero boasted picture, with the demonstration on 18 February and a decision-making system inefficient for the times in forming a republic. The political spoiled ballot seems strange to say the least (if not freaky), negative feedback is unacceptable for a party that claims to be in agreement in 85% of the content of the text and has admitted that the new book is undoubtedly a step forward compared to force.
But as we have run Rivers of ink on the negative vote, political null vote, abstention and blank votes, I would like to reflect upon the meetings held yesterday throughout the country by ERC, and I understand that causes ERC militants have decided to vote NO a text that does not deserve this position:
1. The management of CKD has not managed the photo Zapatero "But, leaving aside whether or not it, or as I like to say to me, the possibilities was to avoid it or not (I think it was null). The direction of ERC failed to understand that hot reactions are heard by the militants, the initial reaction furious would be difficult to turn out, that the farther you were the only path to the Statute itself should go back to him, and most importantly, unless the militants were to understand the need to travel the same path twice in one direction and the opposite. Therefore can not throw people to then ask that everything that should not be taken into account.
2. The demonstration on February 18 stands today more clearly than ever in one of the executioners of the management of CKD, who organized and must now pay their responsibilities. That demonstration is shown more clearly now than ever, was the instrument to justify a position that now, at the last minute, hastily trying to turn, when, as happened to the Titanic, it may be too late, or so it is clear from yesterday's meetings.
3. Someday ERC assemblies would vote in the opposite direction to its direction was something sung, as is, in my opinion, that the assembly system has serious shortcomings for making certain decisions (which does not imply any that has no virtue, that is).
understand asamblearismo therefore that is respectable, it can even be funnier, but has its risks, risks that the leader should be aware and responsible, not simply better to be assembly-supporting and protecting against it, or held accountable when the decision does not match yours. At the time that the assembly makes a decision, the coach is connected to it and must obey it or leave, because it is the responsibility of that decision, because it is "their" decision. Many times we have seen how the Assembly has served as an excuse to avoid responsibility for certain decisions, not least of which we have observed how a leader premonitory feelings launches its people into a position and then is unable to control or change, logical very respected by the militant, as respectable as a serious error is the leader, however, in most cases still relying on the assembly as responsible (very ugly, no?). Therefore, the assembly-model very respectable, but only if leaders assume the responsibilities arising thereof.
0 comments:
Post a Comment